Mobile AI 2026: What Users Actually Want
AI features in mobile apps everywhere. But usage data tells a different story than what the hype suggests. Here's what people are actually using and paying for.
The New Architecture (Fabric, JSI) is finally complete and React Native is mature now. But is it still the right choice for your next mobile project?
Abhi Asok
Founder & CEO, Arvension Technologies
React Native's been in "transition" for what felt like forever. The New Architecture was always "coming soon." Fabric was going to fix everything. JSI would make it fast.
It's here now. And it actually works.
I'm saying that as someone who's been skeptical. I've shipped production React Native apps since 2017. I've also dealt with performance hell, debugging nightmares, and the constant feeling that I was fighting the framework instead of using it. The New Architecture fixes some of that. Not all of it.
So what's my honest take in 2025? You need to think harder about whether React Native is right for your project.
The New Architecture is materially better. Not hype better. Actually better.
Fabric (the new rendering engine) is faster. We're talking noticeably faster startup time, smoother animations, better handling of complex layouts. I tested it on real projects. The frame rate improvements are real. Not life-changing, but real.
JSI (JavaScript-Native Interface) finally gave us a way to communicate with native code that doesn't suck. The old bridge was a bottleneck. The new one isn't. If you need real-time performance—maps, video, complex animations—JSI gives you that.
The ecosystem matured. Expo is genuinely great now. You can bootstrap an app and have a real product in weeks. The tooling is better. The debugging is better. The community figured out answers to questions that were unsolved five years ago.
Code sharing is still the biggest win. Ship an app to iOS and Android and web with one codebase. The percentage of code you actually share depends on your app, but 60-70% is reasonable. That's a real productivity multiplier.
And the talent pool is massive. React developers are everywhere. Teaching a web developer to ship a mobile app as a React Native project is cheaper than hiring a native iOS engineer.
But here's where I'm more honest than the official narrative.
Performance is better, but it's still not native. If you're building something where every frame matters—a complex game, a real-time graphics app—React Native will frustrate you. You'll fight it. You'll need to drop down to native code. The New Architecture made that easier, but it's still a compromise.
Debugging is better, but still worse than native. When something goes wrong in your JavaScript, the stack trace might not lead you to the actual problem. Profiling is still harder than Xcode or Android Studio. If you're the type who needs to understand every line of code running in production, React Native is a tax.
The weird edge cases are gone, mostly. But they're replaced by new weird edge cases. React Navigation has quirks. Platform-specific behavior still bites you. You're always managing slight differences between iOS and Android. "Works on iOS, broken on Android" or vice versa. You'll spend time debugging that.
And the library ecosystem, while bigger, is also messier. There are multiple libraries for the same problem, each with different maturity levels. Pick the wrong one and you're stuck.
Here's the framework I actually use:
Pick React Native if:
Don't pick React Native if:
In 2025, I'm seeing the market split into clear use cases.
React Native for business apps: Forms, lists, navigation, API calls. This is where React Native excels. Your app feels native, performs well enough, and you ship it in half the time. These projects are winning.
React Native for content apps: News apps, social, e-commerce. Less frame-perfect than games, but you need smooth scrolling and quick response times. React Native is getting better at this. Most projects work well.
Native for performance-critical apps: Games, real-time graphics, AR, advanced camera work. React Native is still a struggle here. Stay native.
Mono-repo/framework apps: Expo Router, TaroJS, Ionic. The abstraction layer between you and React Native. These are becoming more popular because they solve the "one codebase, multiple platforms" problem more elegantly. If you're looking at React Native in 2025, you're probably looking at one of these frameworks.
React Native in 2025 is in its "actually good" phase. Not hype cycle. Not proving itself. Actually good.
But it's no longer the obvious choice for every mobile project. Native development improved too. Kotlin and Swift are genuinely good languages now. Jetpack Compose and SwiftUI are genuinely great frameworks. The native developer experience is better than it was five years ago.
So the question isn't "Can I use React Native?" It's "Is React Native the best tool for this project?" And the answer depends on your specifics: team skills, performance requirements, platform strategy, time to market.
If you're betting your company on mobile, you should probably have both options available and choose deliberately. If you need to launch fast and you have React skills, React Native is a solid bet. The New Architecture proved it can compete.
But the days of React Native being the default choice are over. It's just one of the good options now. Pick it intentionally, and it'll work well for you.
AI features in mobile apps everywhere. But usage data tells a different story than what the hype suggests. Here's what people are actually using and paying for.
Nine years building mobile apps. The native vs cross-platform debate isn't settled by hype. Here's what the data actually shows and what it means for your next app.
On-device AI models (Apple Intelligence, Google Gemini Nano) make offline-first AI possible. Real patterns for building features that work without internet.